Get Premium to hide all ads
Posts: 10   Visited by: 45 users
09.07.2013 - 16:04
Could we add a new kind of team games, with auto-balancing functions?
Many team games fail even to start because not balanced; indeed, as reasonable, higher ranks concentrated against lower ranks cause the abandon of wiser players.
Loading...
Loading...
10.07.2013 - 04:59
I would just add that it seems not too difficult to realize this new option. The system should easily recognize the ranks in game and split players as equally as possible. The rest (range of ranks admitted, durations, etc.) should be decided by the host as usual of course.
It would add less predictable games, favorizing "melting pot" and friendly inside the community.
Loading...
Loading...
10.07.2013 - 05:26
Yes this could be done but it would not you to pick a country that you know how to play. Leading to an even bigger problem. Example:

I join a world war 2 game. I can either pick Japan on the axis side or Russia on the ally side. I would prefer Japan as i have played it tons of time and I am more experience with it, but just because of the rank based team balancing I can't play Japan. This forces me to play as Russia. If I mess things up I spoil a game for 17 people.

Further more, what if the rank based team balancing only allows a rank 2 to play Japan? Logically speaking nobody would want some one not experienced at all to play a major country.
Loading...
Loading...
10.07.2013 - 05:35
Solution: don't play garbage unbalanced scenarios and rely on balancing system
----
Written by Amok, 31.08.2012 at 03:10
Fruit's theory is correct
Written by tophat, 30.08.2012 at 21:04
Fruit is right

Loading...
Loading...
10.07.2013 - 10:08
Written by Meester, 10.07.2013 at 05:26

Logically speaking nobody would want some one not experienced at all to play a major country.


You're right, but I wrote that host should decide the ranks range allowed (0-15, or 7-15, or 10-11, or whatever), whic is presently an option for every prem account. You just decide (or agree) the ranks range, accordingly to your liking, the system will split "equally" the teams, the players chose (and can discuss it) as usually.
Loading...
Loading...
10.07.2013 - 10:16
Players have to decide wether they want to play a good (balanced) game or a shitty (unbalanced) game. In the end the "underdog" team will abandon the game and everybody looses (some with SP and other without).
----
Loading...
Loading...
10.07.2013 - 11:54
What about a option in games like "Balance Teams"?
----
Love, peace and respect.
Loading...
Loading...
10.07.2013 - 14:16
 Prey
Written by Deo Volente, 10.07.2013 at 11:54

What about a option in games like "Balance Teams"?

Yes that could work
Loading...
Loading...
10.07.2013 - 15:53
Written by Guest, 10.07.2013 at 14:17

How would you balance teams? If its by rank no :/ If its by stats sure


Can make options like ; balance to SP , balance to win stats.You can pick one of them with asking to other players =)
----
Love, peace and respect.
Loading...
Loading...
10.07.2013 - 21:39
Written by Fruit, 10.07.2013 at 05:35

Solution: don't play garbage unbalanced scenarios and rely on balancing system

Written by Columna Durruti, 10.07.2013 at 10:16

Players have to decide wether they want to play a good (balanced) game or a shitty (unbalanced) game. In the end the "underdog" team will abandon the game and everybody looses (some with SP and others without).


Everything has be said. The rest is up to the players to choose garbage or fun (and thrill).
----
Loading...
Loading...
atWar

About Us
Contact

Privacy | Terms of service | Banners | Partners

Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.

Join us on

Spread the word