Mandatory voting on game options

I think it should be mandatory for every player to vote on any new game options proposed during a game. From what i know, the majority of players must accept the new changes, but alot of people just don't vote at all. Your thoughts?

Not voting = decline. There is not decline button, so yeah.

Make it mandatory, the no vote= decline doesn't stand even in real life, here noobs simply don't know what voting is.

It can be changed so that players have to choose accept or decline, but i don't think that is the way it needs to be. Players can easely spam with proposals every turn, witch is very annoying when you are trying to play your game. I think the current voting option is good as it is.

This is nice suggestion. I support it.

Awesome. Finally, people will actually care.

Written by Hugosch, 01.12.2011 at 12:06

It can be changed so that players have to choose accept or decline, but i don't think that is the way it needs to be. Players can easely spam with proposals every turn, witch is very annoying when you are trying to play your game. I think the current voting option is good as it is.

You're definitely exaggerating here, it would surely take less than 3 seconds to scan through the changes and click "no" if you disagree.

How about this then (if you absolutely must complain); if a player makes the same proposal more than twice, it is automatically confined to the "new turn" window. Problem solved once and for all (hey, that rhymes! ).

Yep, that will solve my problem. Good idea then. You can also think of: If a new rule is declined twice, you are unable to propose new once.

Written by Hugosch, 03.12.2011 at 12:36

Yep, that will solve my problem. Good idea then. You can also think of: If a new rule is declined twice, you are unable to propose new once.

I think it would be better to be unable to propose that specific rule again instead of the inability to propose any new changes at all for 2 declined ones.

Written by Houdini, 03.12.2011 at 12:37

I think it would be better to be unable to propose that specific rule again instead of the inability to propose any new changes at all for 2 declined ones.

Perfect

If it has some kind of limitation (as those already proposed), I agree.

Yes, what Houdini said would make the rule perfect. Since a few of the mods agree with it, how about we set up a poll to vote on it and (possibly) sent it to Ivan or Amok?

Written by Guest, 03.12.2011 at 14:31

...how about we set up a poll to vote on it...

I don't think a poll is necessary as all those involved here are already in agreement and there is no opposition as far as I can see

Written by Guest, 03.12.2011 at 14:31

...and (possibly) sent it to Ivan or Amok?

Done. This thread will remain open however until the admins have given their response.

Noticed. Added to the to-do list

I said twice because people may be sweating hard the first time round due to some difficult conflict going on and will close the window following a nervous reaction.

Nevertheless I am glad this is being implemented, good idea Samnang! Have some rep (oh wait, I've already given you some ;_;).

Written by YOBA, 04.12.2011 at 11:32

Have some rep (oh wait, I've already given you some ;_;).

Click the button anyway

Written by Sificvoid, 03.12.2011 at 15:18

I don't think a poll is necessary as all those involved here are already in agreement and there is no opposition as far as I can see

I oppose. See, now we need a poll. My opinion matters too!