What do you think about this

http://www.orgullodominicano.com/articles/7667/lo-dejaron-morir-por-que-medico-de-turno-dijo-que-lo-habia-atrac

Basically a doctor refuses to attend a patient because he realized that the guy had robbed him before. The patient dies afterward.

I'd say due to professional ethics the doctor should have attend him... but on the other hand, how can you attend someone that is doing nothing but wrongdoings for the society, and that could potentially kill you?

Do you think the doctor did good or bad?

Discuss.

This isnt an ethical or moral question for me... this is a "do your fucking job for which you are paid for Doc".

The doctor violated the Hippocratic Oath and is liable to be stripped of his medical license. Also, that guy just robbed him. Not like a murdered a family member. Allowing him to die was not cool

I guess i will avoid robbing doctors from now on

Gj

Hippocratic Oath,who cares about it,right? xd

I didn't watch the video so I am going strictly off of what you said. The doctor should have treated the man. Doctors are not part of the judicial system. They do not have the powers of the prosecutor, judge, or the jury; thus he should not have decided that this person deserved the :death penalty." He should have done what he is payed to do, or have someone else treat the man.

Tbh id have done the same, its like u invade a foreign country and a enemy soldier kills ur comrade then surrenders. Would u really take him as a prisoner if he killed your comrade u have been with for months even maybe years?

Written by Emperor Lelouch, 10.03.2016 at 19:45

Tbh id have done the same, its like u invade a foreign country and a enemy soldier kills ur comrade then surrenders. Would u really take him as a prisoner if he killed your comrade u have been with for months even maybe years?

Killing and robbing are drastically different crimes. Either way, if this was all happening between American citizens, the person who committed a crime still has the right to a trial. No one should have the power to try, convict, and sentence (especially with a death sentence) a person. There is a judicial process set up to handle crimes; no one should have the ability to circumnavigate this process.

Btw. the guy that died was 16 years old and recieved 3 shots from police, aledgedly when he already was in custody.
Doctor should be removed for not fulfilling his duty: saving lives.

Written by Dereny, 10.03.2016 at 19:52

Written by Emperor Lelouch, 10.03.2016 at 19:45

Tbh id have done the same, its like u invade a foreign country and a enemy soldier kills ur comrade then surrenders. Would u really take him as a prisoner if he killed your comrade u have been with for months even maybe years?

Killing and robbing are drastically different crimes. Either way, if this was all happening between American citizens, the person who committed a crime still has the right to a trial. No one should have the power to try, convict, and sentence (especially with a death sentence) a person. There is a judicial process set up to handle crimes; no one should have the ability to circumnavigate this process.

but this isnt america... and robbing and murder are classified the same thing to God

Written by Columna Durruti, 10.03.2016 at 20:01

Btw. the guy that died was 16 years old and recieved 3 shots from police, aledgedly when he already was in custody.
Doctor should be removed for not fulfilling his duty: saving lives.

if he was 16 and already shot by the police and known to rob he wouldnt have a good life anyway but if the cops shot him then id blame the cops more for shooting him then the doctor for not treating him

Written by Emperor Lelouch, 10.03.2016 at 20:06

Written by Columna Durruti, 10.03.2016 at 20:01

Btw. the guy that died was 16 years old and recieved 3 shots from police, aledgedly when he already was in custody.
Doctor should be removed for not fulfilling his duty: saving lives.

if he was 16 and already shot by the police and known to rob he wouldnt have a good life anyway but if the cops shot him then id blame the cops more for shooting him then the doctor for not treating him

Assholes (police and doctor) the same way. The ones for giving the poison and the other for not giving the antidote.

Written by Columna Durruti, 10.03.2016 at 20:14

Written by Emperor Lelouch, 10.03.2016 at 20:06

Written by Columna Durruti, 10.03.2016 at 20:01

Btw. the guy that died was 16 years old and recieved 3 shots from police, aledgedly when he already was in custody.
Doctor should be removed for not fulfilling his duty: saving lives.

if he was 16 and already shot by the police and known to rob he wouldnt have a good life anyway but if the cops shot him then id blame the cops more for shooting him then the doctor for not treating him

Assholes (police and doctor) the same way. The ones for giving the poison and the other for not giving the antidote.

i agree but dont tell them that lol

Well done!

Written by Emperor Lelouch, 10.03.2016 at 20:05

Written by Dereny, 10.03.2016 at 19:52

Written by Emperor Lelouch, 10.03.2016 at 19:45

Tbh id have done the same, its like u invade a foreign country and a enemy soldier kills ur comrade then surrenders. Would u really take him as a prisoner if he killed your comrade u have been with for months even maybe years?

Killing and robbing are drastically different crimes. Either way, if this was all happening between American citizens, the person who committed a crime still has the right to a trial. No one should have the power to try, convict, and sentence (especially with a death sentence) a person. There is a judicial process set up to handle crimes; no one should have the ability to circumnavigate this process.

but this isnt america... and robbing and murder are classified the same thing to God

I don't know what country it was in, but I'm sure they have a full functioning judicial system. Secondly, why does the belief of a god have anything to do with morals?

Written by Dereny, 10.03.2016 at 21:40

Written by Emperor Lelouch, 10.03.2016 at 20:05

Written by Dereny, 10.03.2016 at 19:52

Written by Emperor Lelouch, 10.03.2016 at 19:45

Tbh id have done the same, its like u invade a foreign country and a enemy soldier kills ur comrade then surrenders. Would u really take him as a prisoner if he killed your comrade u have been with for months even maybe years?

Killing and robbing are drastically different crimes. Either way, if this was all happening between American citizens, the person who committed a crime still has the right to a trial. No one should have the power to try, convict, and sentence (especially with a death sentence) a person. There is a judicial process set up to handle crimes; no one should have the ability to circumnavigate this process.

but this isnt america... and robbing and murder are classified the same thing to God

I don't know what country it was in, but I'm sure they have a full functioning judicial system. Secondly, why does the belief of a god have anything to do with morals?

morals basically are what stop people from doing things like murder stealing robbing...etc which can be assorted with following the "law" which all "laws" are based of originally the 10 commandments. And basically i said "and robbing and murder are classified the same thing to God" because in God's eyes all sins are equal. Adultery is weighed the same as murder as far as sin goes.

But this is off-topic so ill stop

Honestly if he was 16 and robbing people and getting shot he was probably a waster fucktit who would have gotten himself cut open slowly by a gang later on in life.
As it stands i would say "karma's a bitch" and "good riddance to bad rubbish".

Also that doctor probably refused to attend the 16 year old because he was robbed by him. He may well have felt that would have lead to emotions that ,if he was operating on the kid wouldn't let him do his job to the best of his ability, also just because he didn't attend to the kid Immediately doesn't mean that the THREE bullet holes weren't already a death sentance and there was probably very little that himself or the second doctor were going to be able to do.
I'm assuming a second docter was sent after he refused because that's how stuff works in the world, generally speaking.