Bring back counter insurgency

Vote

Yes but with a nerf of infantry units, no reason an Air Offensive strategy should have 50 cost infantry that has 4 attack and 6 defense.

Ofc, shouldn't have left to begin with.

Written by PleaseMe, 29.03.2019 at 02:03

Yes but with a nerf of infantry units, no reason an Air Offensive strategy should have 50 cost infantry that has 4 attack and 6 defense.

it's not even air offensive. the sentries suck. just use it like a buff version of none strat lol

Written by boywind2, 29.03.2019 at 02:46

Written by PleaseMe, 29.03.2019 at 02:03

Yes but with a nerf of infantry units, no reason an Air Offensive strategy should have 50 cost infantry that has 4 attack and 6 defense.

it's not even air offensive. the sentries suck. just use it like a buff version of none strat lol

Yea probably best to buff those sentries. But everyone only wants it because the infantry units are OP, not because the sentries had anything to do with it.

Yes, it fit right in perfectly with the other strats.
Unlike the abomination of a strat that was inssurection.

Bring back ci with a new name D

Written by Froyer, 29.03.2019 at 09:21

Bring back ci with a new name D

Why a new name?

Written by Garde, 29.03.2019 at 10:12

Written by Froyer, 29.03.2019 at 09:21

Bring back ci with a new name D

Why a new name?

Cant be counter insurrection cuz no insurrection zzz

Written by Froyer, 29.03.2019 at 10:25

Cant be counter insurrection cuz no insurrection zzz

Just name it something else

Written by Froyer, 29.03.2019 at 10:25

Written by Garde, 29.03.2019 at 10:12

Written by Froyer, 29.03.2019 at 09:21

Bring back ci with a new name D

Why a new name?

Cant be counter insurrection cuz no insurrection zzz

Why do you people think this strategy had anything to do with Insurrection? Christ, we've already been over this: The naming conventions were merely coincidental. This really goes to show the low IQ AtWar players have when they can't piece this together on their own.

Written by Garde, 29.03.2019 at 10:40

Written by Froyer, 29.03.2019 at 10:25

Written by Garde, 29.03.2019 at 10:12

Written by Froyer, 29.03.2019 at 09:21

Bring back ci with a new name D

Why a new name?

Cant be counter insurrection cuz no insurrection zzz

Why do you people think this strategy had anything to do with Insurrection? Christ, we've already been over this: The naming conventions were merely coincidental. This really goes to show the low IQ AtWar players have when they can't piece this together on their own.

Bro dont start to talk like this or cc will be forced to mute me on forum again

Written by Froyer, 29.03.2019 at 10:41

Written by Garde, 29.03.2019 at 10:40

Written by Froyer, 29.03.2019 at 10:25

Written by Garde, 29.03.2019 at 10:12

Written by Froyer, 29.03.2019 at 09:21

Bring back ci with a new name D

Why a new name?

Cant be counter insurrection cuz no insurrection zzz

Why do you people think this strategy had anything to do with Insurrection? Christ, we've already been over this: The naming conventions were merely coincidental. This really goes to show the low IQ AtWar players have when they can't piece this together on their own.

Bro dont start to talk like this or cc will be forced to mute me on forum again

t. egg

But haha, probably. CI is a fine name either way, and I can understand some people's confusion. Insurgency is merely referring to tactical insurgency and the point of CI is to uncover any insurgent scheming and deal with it... by smashing sentries into it.

There seems to be a lot of no votes while most people who responded to the thread said yes. Who are the no voters?

Definitely agree, the strategy was something nice and new that actually fit in. It countered some strategies while also was able to get countered, which i think is the perfect balance- I honestly don't know why it was taken away, but hopefully we see it returning soon.

Personally, I just want new stuff, regardless if it's shit or not. So I voted yes.

I thought this was a troll strat (and I didn't test it) and a troll post so it seems it's a good strat

Written by Froyer, 29.03.2019 at 10:25

Written by Garde, 29.03.2019 at 10:12

Written by Froyer, 29.03.2019 at 09:21

Bring back ci with a new name D

Why a new name?

Cant be counter insurrection cuz no insurrection zzz

ITS COUNTER INSURGENCY

Written by Witch-Doctor, 29.03.2019 at 12:41

There seems to be a lot of no votes while most people who responded to the thread said yes. Who are the no voters?

some gay haters who dont give 2 shits probably

Yes. It only needs a minor patch for the strat to be solid.

Written by Witch-Doctor, 29.03.2019 at 12:41

There seems to be a lot of no votes while most people who responded to the thread said yes. Who are the no voters?

Me

Written by Nations, 30.03.2019 at 01:21

Written by Witch-Doctor, 29.03.2019 at 12:41

There seems to be a lot of no votes while most people who responded to the thread said yes. Who are the no voters?

Me

Any reason why?

Written by Witch-Doctor, 29.03.2019 at 12:41

There seems to be a lot of no votes while most people who responded to the thread said yes. Who are the no voters?

theres always been a silent majority on atwar when it comes to this sorta stuff, is strange indeed

edit: 4 alts have voted though, but the difference between yes and no is more than 4, so doesnt really have major impact. It appears as its more 50/50

Written by Sultan of Swing, 31.03.2019 at 21:02

Written by Witch-Doctor, 29.03.2019 at 12:41

There seems to be a lot of no votes while most people who responded to the thread said yes. Who are the no voters?

theres always been a silent majority on atwar when it comes to this sorta stuff, is strange indeed

edit: 4 alts have voted though, but the difference between yes and no is more than 4, so doesnt really have major impact. It appears as its more 50/50

whos alts were they

Counter-Insurgency needs to come back into the game, but with PD tanks instead of normal tanks. That's really all the strat really needs for balance. Also, MAYBE give just the infantry a +2 defense bonus against marines instead of a +1, since they'd really just have PD defense against marines otherwise.

When was this ever a thing? I don't ever remember it being an option.

Zzzz 45no. Cl was a nice strat bla

Bring it back, but with weaker tanks and stronger sentries.

The masses has spoken. This is what was asked all those years with strat changes by the "elite". Now the same "elite" try to force it but aint happening. Good thing after all those years they got karma.