True moderator representing? [Free speech, no reason to delete]

First of all, I have no problem with emare, but this time his actions should have consequences.

So today in a roomchat some dude called trismagetius was talking about the prophet muhammed, and some other dude was like '' he is a pedo'' and than e mare actually said the same thing, the moderator who bans people for saying jew or nazi or kebab, says things like that and then ends with ''deal with it''?

Here are the following screenshots.






If people dont believe the screenshots above, here is a screenshot of the whole chat.



He will probably totally denial this, and probably delete this thread to cover up the damage. But when recently various threads were made about the religion hate speech in off-topic hearing this from a moderator that should represent this game is just outragious. This is wrong attitude coming from a moderator who is the representative side of this game, and probably one of the reasons why people dont feel welcome in this game.


Once again, I have nothing against emare, but this is a low blow...

When i try to hint at the possibility that something may need to change in islam, its hate speech.
When e-mare insults a entire religion, its facts.

Why are the islam apologists not calling e-mare out like they would do with me?

Written by b0nker2, 23.08.2015 at 07:52

You broke the rules. He implemented a punish for that. Your answer is to break the rules of forum etiquette again. In doing so any points you have (if any) are overlooked since you still don't understand the initial rule break.

You cannot argue abuse and misuse if you are doing this yourself.

Drama queens .

Nowhere in the mod logs do i see bans for saying "jew" or "nazis". I would sincerely hope no mod would be foolish enough to consider anything like that hate speech. It is the difference between. "islam appears to have a problem with extremists" and "**** muslims they're all terrorists."

What emare said is not quoted from the qur'an, but seems to be some sort of 2000 year old unconfirmed rumour. Given that girls were married off young in such times it might not be far off. And indeed by todays standards that would make him and many other historical men of various cultures and religions "pedos".

But who cares, this is not hatepseech, nor is it worthy of a thread. If you feel you've been unjustly punished for supposed hatespeech or the like, contact another mod.

Locked