Some wall ideas...

1.- I Support you.
2.- you can do that already

Air Walls are a pretty good idea, but i hope they only block other air units.

3.- explain better the idea, idk what are you saying.

I support the first... the second I think he means a triangle wall with no gaps... and I dont understand the third one either :S

The first one was suggested many times before, it's not a good idea. The second one would make SM more op, if you got money you can wall everything.

I don't support any of this ideas.

Written by clovis1122, 21.12.2012 at 14:14

Written by Roncho, 21.12.2012 at 08:45

I don't support any of this ideas.

oh really? wont you like thad the battle get out of ankara insteat of the same city? or you want innocent turkist people
( like you for example) died very hard? nan I prefered the income & saved people way( OUT OF THE CITY OF COUSE)

I don't understand you...

Written by Roncho, 21.12.2012 at 14:17

Written by clovis1122, 21.12.2012 at 14:14

Written by Roncho, 21.12.2012 at 08:45

I don't support any of this ideas.

oh really? wont you like thad the battle get out of ankara insteat of the same city? or you want innocent turkist people
( like you for example) died very hard? nan I prefered the income & saved people way( OUT OF THE CITY OF COUSE)

I don't understand you...

He says that if he dont walls cities inocent people will die.

No problem for me. No one sends more then 1 units to Samsun...

Written by Guest, 21.12.2012 at 08:41

The first one was suggested many times before, it's not a good idea. The second one would make SM more op, if you got money you can wall everything.

well then it could be balanced by halfing the cost of anti air or something.

Written by Cherse, 21.12.2012 at 21:07

Written by Guest, 21.12.2012 at 08:41

The first one was suggested many times before, it's not a good idea. The second one would make SM more op, if you got money you can wall everything.

well then it could be balanced by halfing the cost of anti air or something.

It's fine as it is now .

Written by clovis1122, 21.12.2012 at 20:08

Written by Guest, 21.12.2012 at 08:41

The first one was suggested many times before, it's not a good idea.

why not a good idea? lol then I can stop some **** haters sending 1 bomber to my cap. Then I can put all the troop on the wall insteat of the cap = income & innocent people saves (win or lose you will keep the income & poulaction alive.Also will be a secure way due to if you win you can keep the wall...)= less range needded = win

Written by Guest, 21.12.2012 at 08:41

The second one would make SM more op, if you got money you can wall everything.

I am talking about 1 ground unit and then you can put air units without make wall to break... this go in the hand winth the 1st Idea so I can add bombers to the wall...

It's fine as it is, breaking walls would be much harder.

http://atwar-game.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=4141

http://atwar-game.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=3504

Written by Guest, 22.12.2012 at 09:43

Written by clovis1122, 21.12.2012 at 20:08

Written by Guest, 21.12.2012 at 08:41

The first one was suggested many times before, it's not a good idea.

why not a good idea? lol then I can stop some **** haters sending 1 bomber to my cap. Then I can put all the troop on the wall insteat of the cap = income & innocent people saves (win or lose you will keep the income & poulaction alive.Also will be a secure way due to if you win you can keep the wall...)= less range needded = win

Written by Guest, 21.12.2012 at 08:41

The second one would make SM more op, if you got money you can wall everything.

I am talking about 1 ground unit and then you can put air units without make wall to break... this go in the hand winth the 1st Idea so I can add bombers to the wall...

It's fine as it is, breaking walls would be much harder.

http://atwar-game.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=4141

http://atwar-game.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=3504

a close-minded noob.

this idea will encourage better players.

Written by Tundy, 22.12.2012 at 10:10

Written by Guest, 22.12.2012 at 09:43

Written by clovis1122, 21.12.2012 at 20:08

Written by Guest, 21.12.2012 at 08:41

The first one was suggested many times before, it's not a good idea.

why not a good idea? lol then I can stop some **** haters sending 1 bomber to my cap. Then I can put all the troop on the wall insteat of the cap = income & innocent people saves (win or lose you will keep the income & poulaction alive.Also will be a secure way due to if you win you can keep the wall...)= less range needded = win

Written by Guest, 21.12.2012 at 08:41

The second one would make SM more op, if you got money you can wall everything.

I am talking about 1 ground unit and then you can put air units without make wall to break... this go in the hand winth the 1st Idea so I can add bombers to the wall...

It's fine as it is, breaking walls would be much harder.

http://atwar-game.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=4141

http://atwar-game.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=3504

a close-minded noob.

this idea will encourage better players.

>Calls me noob >Can't even beat a rank 4 on his own crappy map.

Better players? How? lol.
Also this will help 'secret alliances' etc.

Completly pointless to keep speaking in this post...

Written by clovis1122, 22.12.2012 at 12:16

Written by Guest, 22.12.2012 at 10:17

It's fine as it is, breaking walls would be much harder.

then do you prefered a pacific War of the Triple Alliance went all paraguayan troop died out of the city and saved some paraguayan live? or you want as it happened? went 70% people died?. This can saved people thad play against players like chess , thad like to make a BIG BIG stack and get on your territory breaking walls, fuking your income, and the best part is thad his troop is walled all the times...

I don't understand you but AW doesn't have to be reallistic.

Written by Guest, 22.12.2012 at 10:17

Written by Tundy, 22.12.2012 at 10:10

Written by Guest, 22.12.2012 at 09:43

Written by clovis1122, 21.12.2012 at 20:08

Written by Guest, 21.12.2012 at 08:41

The first one was suggested many times before, it's not a good idea.

why not a good idea? lol then I can stop some **** haters sending 1 bomber to my cap. Then I can put all the troop on the wall insteat of the cap = income & innocent people saves (win or lose you will keep the income & poulaction alive.Also will be a secure way due to if you win you can keep the wall...)= less range needded = win

Written by Guest, 21.12.2012 at 08:41

The second one would make SM more op, if you got money you can wall everything.

I am talking about 1 ground unit and then you can put air units without make wall to break... this go in the hand winth the 1st Idea so I can add bombers to the wall...

It's fine as it is, breaking walls would be much harder.

http://atwar-game.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=4141

http://atwar-game.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=3504

a close-minded noob.

this idea will encourage better players.

>Calls me noob >Can't even beat a rank 4 on his own crappy map.

Better players? How? lol.
Also this will help 'secret alliances' etc.

nah, you are just noob.
you have no idea of how walls are exploited easily.

Written by clovis1122, 23.12.2012 at 19:21

Written by Guest, 23.12.2012 at 10:58

Written by clovis1122, 22.12.2012 at 12:16

Written by Guest, 22.12.2012 at 10:17

It's fine as it is, breaking walls would be much harder.

then do you prefered a pacific War of the Triple Alliance went all paraguayan troop died out of the city and saved some paraguayan live? or you want as it happened? went 70% people died?. This can saved people thad play against players like chess , thad like to make a BIG BIG stack and get on your territory breaking walls, fuking your income, and the best part is thad his troop is walled all the times...

I don't understand you but AW doesn't have to be reallistic.

just making an example of how can stronger wall help you. anyway I saw it on a mulish movie went all troop go out of the city for fight insteat of fight on the city... strong wall will make you to not lost income & people like paraguayan people lost on the war of the triple alliance -_-

Walls would be really hard to break. Walls would be op.

Written by Tundy, 24.12.2012 at 00:28

Written by Guest, 22.12.2012 at 10:17

Written by Tundy, 22.12.2012 at 10:10

Written by Guest, 22.12.2012 at 09:43

Written by clovis1122, 21.12.2012 at 20:08

Written by Guest, 21.12.2012 at 08:41

The first one was suggested many times before, it's not a good idea.

why not a good idea? lol then I can stop some **** haters sending 1 bomber to my cap. Then I can put all the troop on the wall insteat of the cap = income & innocent people saves (win or lose you will keep the income & poulaction alive.Also will be a secure way due to if you win you can keep the wall...)= less range needded = win

Written by Guest, 21.12.2012 at 08:41

The second one would make SM more op, if you got money you can wall everything.

I am talking about 1 ground unit and then you can put air units without make wall to break... this go in the hand winth the 1st Idea so I can add bombers to the wall...

It's fine as it is, breaking walls would be much harder.

http://atwar-game.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=4141

http://atwar-game.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=3504

a close-minded noob.

this idea will encourage better players.

>Calls me noob >Can't even beat a rank 4 on his own crappy map.

Better players? How? lol.
Also this will help 'secret alliances' etc.

nah, you are just noob.
you have no idea of how walls are exploited easily.

I know, there are exploits but what do exploits have to do with unbreakable walls?

STOP speaking in this post.

Written by clovis1122, 25.12.2012 at 11:50

Written by Guest, 24.12.2012 at 13:29

Walls would be really hard to break. Walls would be op.

why you call it "OP" ? if you can find another way to keep income and people alive on a city thad will be hard attaked next turn, then you can blame OP walls -_-

Just defend the city. It's not hard and you don't need a super income to defend.

Written by clovis1122, 25.12.2012 at 18:35

Written by Guest, 25.12.2012 at 17:55

Written by clovis1122, 25.12.2012 at 11:50

Written by Guest, 24.12.2012 at 13:29

Walls would be really hard to break. Walls would be op.

why you call it "OP" ? if you can find another way to keep income and people alive on a city thad will be hard attaked next turn, then you can blame OP walls -_-

Just defend the city. It's not hard and you don't need a super income to defend.

but I will need the city reinformed and income next turn... would be more easy to battle out of the city and keep income& reinfomed& survive dat exact reinformed thad you need ^_^

That's just op. If you don't want to lose the reinforcements just defend it, it's the same.

If this gets implemented, it will help secret alliances on FFAs etc.

Written by clovis1122, 26.12.2012 at 12:18

Written by Guest, 26.12.2012 at 11:00

That's just op. If you don't want to lose the reinforcements just defend it, it's the same.

If this gets implemented, it will help secret alliances on FFAs etc.

if you do the battle on the wall then THEY WONT TAKE CITY YET? cuz battle didnt was in the city

how this would help FFA secret alliance? if at the end they will kill themseve only one can win on a FFA...

If you can't speak english just use spanish .

You can wall the caps of other people with lot of units so no one takes his cap.

Written by Guest, 26.12.2012 at 13:45

Written by clovis1122, 26.12.2012 at 12:18

Written by Guest, 26.12.2012 at 11:00

That's just op. If you don't want to lose the reinforcements just defend it, it's the same.

If this gets implemented, it will help secret alliances on FFAs etc.

if you do the battle on the wall then THEY WONT TAKE CITY YET? cuz battle didnt was in the city

how this would help FFA secret alliance? if at the end they will kill themseve only one can win on a FFA...

If you can't speak english just use spanish .

You can wall the caps of other people with lot of units so no one takes his cap.

super secret alliance that is