St Louis Riots

Soft Martial Law enforced in Ferguson, St.Louis due to mass riots after a drug dealer was shot by police. He was truly Obamas son (hue) The black population then rioted after protests deciding to trash their own areas of all its economic infrastructure. Black peoples on twitter then called these people silly and said they should loot and riot in white areas instead. 'Not your own' they claimed.

In LA, another drug dealer was killed by police, a protest will be held on Saturday. So riots might also begin in LA too.

So grab some popcorn and watch the world burn as the wonders of Diversity & Multicultural, mutliethnic enrichment show their fruits for all to see.

Truly, this rainbow of equality has no limitations to its blessings.

If there is going to be a riot in LA, count me in. I need some stuff for 5 fingers.

45 Drug dealers where shoot, yesterday in mexico, nobody gives a shit

After having spent a full year browsing /pol/, I can safely theorize that your power level is full of large quantities of tinfoil and vermillion pill. The riots are not justified, but the anger is, slightly. Yes, the kid was stealing from a store, but he also gave up when caught in the act and would have came silently. Can we blame this on the officer fearing for his life? Of course. But it's his job to keep his cool and have the correct reaction to any action taken by the criminal. This is a case of mutliethnic issues, sure, but on both sides. Blacks, as well as Whites are in the wrong in this situation. You cannot deny that.

Written by Guest, 15.08.2014 at 20:49

After having spent a full year browsing /pol/, I can safely theorize that your power level is full of large quantities of tinfoil and vermillion pill. The riots are not justified, but the anger is, slightly. Yes, the kid was stealing from a store, but he also gave up when caught in the act and would have came silently. Can we blame this on the officer fearing for his life? Of course. But it's his job to keep his cool and have the correct reaction to any action taken by the criminal. This is a case of mutliethnic issues, sure, but on both sides. Blacks, as well as Whites are in the wrong in this situation. You cannot deny that.

Gardefag pls, at no point has this ever become a race issue(besides the idiots claiming it is) between "whites" and any blacks. At its core this is a case between two people of different races where one of said races go completely ape and destroy everything around them, most just because they want to pillage. As a whole the "whites" can not be wrong because they aren't involved, just this one cop, whereas a large group of blacks are at fault for being scum and looting irregardless of if you look at it racially or not. Also he was an outright criminal, when robbing at gunpoint there should be no qualms with shooting him as that's an inherently violent crime, no tolerance for such degenerates.

They released a video of Michael Brown robbing a thrift store 10 minutes before he was shot. He was only a kid.. In this instance you have to blame the guardians of this 6'3 animal of a kid. The Guardians should be punished too, and make it a lesson for those who want their kids running around doing bad things.

As for racial stereotyping, 100% obvious it's there... America the only land to have African American Military leaders... But 1 white cop shoots a black criminal, and all of a sudden America is still racist? Media really need to stop making big deals out of nothing... What about when 4 black thugs jumped a white mom, killed her?? This happened last year backeast..

Anyways, I'm not racist. It doesn't matter what color of the rainbow you are, if you are doing something bad, you deserve something bad.

Written by Mr_Own_U, 15.08.2014 at 21:15

America the only land to have African American Military leaders...

Communism fell.... get over it.

as for whats going on in st. louis, i feel the whole race card gets thrown out there over and over again. it gets on my nerves when people start rioting when one person gets killed and all of a sudden its called racism or a hate crime. never have i seen a white man being killed by a black man or any other mixture of races that erupt in riots in america and certainly not at the point they blame the "militarization" of the police.... give me a break.

But theres no such thing as a "black" race and a "white" race

Written by syrianforce, 16.08.2014 at 14:11

But theres no such thing as a "black" race and a "white" race

only black skin, and white skin, and everything else is in between.

I cannot comprehend

Written by syrianforce, 16.08.2014 at 14:18

I cannot comprehend

Skin color actually matters, it's part of human evolution, saying that we all are equal and there is no different races, is like saying chameleons are of different colors due to swag.

Australia is the best example of what happens when a white population is moved into a previously non-white environment, the skin cancer ratio is over the roof.

Darker skin colors are less prone to UV light damage, hence a black person with skin cancer is less likely, and in most cases, skin cancer begins on the white parts of the hands or feet. this doesnt mean there is a sort of superiority complex, just simple biology where darker skin repels more light while lighter skin attracts light. hence, in areas of extreme cold, you find more lighter skin individuals due to their skin attracting more light ie. warmth

Written by Guest, 15.08.2014 at 20:49

After having spent a full year browsing /pol/, I can safely theorize that your power level is full of large quantities of tinfoil and vermillion pill.

You can't even comprehend my power level, scrub.

Written by Guest, 15.08.2014 at 20:49

but the anger is, slightly.

It isn't. Not in this case.

Written by Guest, 15.08.2014 at 20:49

Yes, the kid was stealing from a store, but he also gave up when caught in the act and would have came silently.

Kid? He was well over 6 foot. He wasn't a 'kid.' He battered the snot out of the police officer responding to the thuggery theft and robbery at the store. Photos of his injuries will be out soon.

Written by Guest, 15.08.2014 at 20:49

But it's his job to keep his cool and have the correct reaction to any action taken by the criminal.

Shooting someone who is beating you is pretty justified.

Written by Guest, 15.08.2014 at 20:49

This is a case of mutliethnic issues, sure, but on both sides. Blacks, as well as Whites are in the wrong in this situation. You cannot deny that.

No. Its a case of tribalism showing its face again. Blacks are fine with murdering eachother by the thousands every few months but when one white police officer does his job and takes out a violent unproductive criminal, they retaliate by burning down their economic infrastructure, threatening other ethnic groups and holding vigils for some saintly fictional character who was pure scum in reality.

Its a racial issue, especially when many wanted to burn, rape and loot white suburban areas with zero justification.

Written by Skanderbeg, 16.08.2014 at 08:48

So if you want to change system on the west you will end up dead on the street

Because the East is so much different.

Written by Skanderbeg, 16.08.2014 at 08:48

Now capitalism will jump from one crisis to another until it finally collapse.

Yes... but most of these crisis' are manufactured. The REAL crisis is the depreciation of social cohesion and the relationship between man and woman.

Written by Skanderbeg, 16.08.2014 at 08:48

Social inequality, absence of human rights, racism,

These are NOT the issues. These are the manufactured crisis'. This is leftist bullshit that has ZERO effect on society. Stop pretending to be a standard for human rights and Equality when you OPENLY support massacring half a population for not bowing to you.

The issue is NOT Equality. Equality is an arbitrary, unattainable goal. THe West attempts to ENFORCE Equality, that is one of the core problems. Human Rights are meaningless. There is only the rights of the Citizen, nothing more. Racism? GTFO of here. Racism has never been the issue, its a communist word with no meaning. 99.9% of the population cant even agree what 'racism' even means.

Written by Skanderbeg, 16.08.2014 at 08:48

extremism.

You are a COMMUNIST. YOU ARE THE EXTREME.

Written by Skanderbeg, 16.08.2014 at 08:48

Hell, even we could do that in USSR when communism started collapsing, we could use army and kill civilians, but we didnt, because it isnt right.

No, the Soviets never hurt anyone. They were a peaceful society. Gulags are a Western lie.

Written by Mr_Own_U, 15.08.2014 at 21:15

They released a video of Michael Brown robbing a thrift store 10 minutes before he was shot. He was only a kid.. In this instance you have to blame the guardians of this 6'3 animal of a kid. The Guardians should be punished too, and make it a lesson for those who want their kids running around doing bad things.

As for racial stereotyping, 100% obvious it's there... America the only land to have African American Military leaders... But 1 white cop shoots a black criminal, and all of a sudden America is still racist? Media really need to stop making big deals out of nothing... What about when 4 black thugs jumped a white mom, killed her?? This happened last year backeast..

Anyways, I'm not racist. It doesn't matter what color of the rainbow you are, if you are doing something bad, you deserve something bad.

Exactly, people throw out the race card too much like Trayvon Martin. The media always tries to paint them as these young kids when in fact they were 18 or older. We have a black president and black attorney general yet the race card is alway sthrown around. I have never heard of a case where a black person killed a white person and then that was called a hate crime.

No skin color doesn't matter at all...

Written by syrianforce, 16.08.2014 at 19:07

No skin color doesn't matter at all...

It shouldnt matter but it is always brought up

Http://wupa.wustl.edu/record_archive/1998/10-15-98/articles/races.html

"Biological differences among races do not exist, WU research shows"

Written by syrianforce, 16.08.2014 at 14:11

But theres no such thing as a "black" race and a "white" race

Yes there are. There is the European geographical racial group and the SubSaharan African geographical racial group, each with their own sub groups. This is all peer reviewed science. White simply means European. Sure, there is no 'pure' European. Whiteness originates from NW Europe which holds the most unique European heritage but its still a large racial group with subsets.

Denying race is denying science. Skin is not race. Race is much, much bigger than simple skin pigmentation.



If SubSaharan Africans had White Skin, Blue Eyes and Blonde Hair. They would still be easily identifiable as SubSaharan Africans. The colour of our skin is just the simplest fofrm of identification we can recognise. But it is merely a tip of the iceberg as to what race really is.

Templeton analyzed genetic data from mitochondrial DNA, a form inherited only from the maternal side; Y chromosome DNA, paternally inherited DNA; and nuclear DNA, inherited from both sexes. His results showed that 85 percent of genetic variation in the human DNA was due to individual variation. A mere 15 percent could be traced to what could be interpreted as "racial" differences.
"The 15 percent is well below the threshold that is used to recognize race in other species," Templeton said. "In many other large mammalian species, we see rates of differentiation two or three times that of humans before the lineages are even recognized as races. Humans are one of the most genetically homogenous species we know of. There's lots of genetic variation in humanity, but it's basically at the individual level. The between-population variation is very, very minor."

Media Draws Map to Home of Ferguson Police Officer Who Shot Mike Brown
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/08/death-wish-media-draws-map-to-home-of-ferguson-police-officer-who-shot-mike-brown/

Media is really trying to rustle people. They clearly want someone to kill him so they can report and cause even more shitstorms.

Ah, how interesting. My source is from the Washington University in St.Louis.

"Race is a real cultural, political and economic concept in society, but it is not a biological concept, and that unfortunately is what many people wrongfully consider to be the essence of race in humans -- genetic differences," Templeton said. "Evolutionary history is the key to understanding race, and new molecular biology techniques offer so much on recent evolutionary history. I wanted to bring some objectivity to the topic. This very objective analysis shows the outcome is not even a close call: There's nothing even like a really distinct subdivision of humanity."

Written by syrianforce, 16.08.2014 at 19:18

"The 15 percent is well below the threshold that is used to recognize race in other species,"

Arbitrary. There isn't actually an official field to separate species and I never claimed racial groups were a different species. 15% is NOT minor, that is HUGE on a genetic level. Are you saying a 15% difference is minor? Only a moron would make such a claim. The actual difference in genetic make up is around 2-4%. That seems small but compare that to the difference between between humans and chimps which is around 4-5%. That is an enormous difference. But at no point did I say we are a different species. Dogs are the same species but their 'racial' groups are obvious and well defined. They have very different attributes. The only difference is they are selectively bred while we were naturally bred by our environments. Civilization has also selectively bred specific populations.

Written by syrianforce, 16.08.2014 at 19:18

The between-population variation is very, very minor."

From a species perspective, yes, but not from the perspective of dictating social policy. Also, remember, this is a 15% difference on humans beings as an average. Some groups are far more related than others while others further apart.

You still ignored a very solid point. Your claim it was merely skin is actually Marxist manipulation of language. Race is more than skin and the fact that Europeans and SubSaharan Africans would be easily identifiable despite identical colourings of skin, hair and eyes, shows there are distinct markers of seperation.

Noone mentioned species. Dont bother going down that route. And dont quote that shitty out of context quote claiming there is more similarity between groups than within groups. Its out of context and frankly laughable.

Written by syrianforce, 16.08.2014 at 19:26

"Race is a real cultural, political and economic concept in society, but it is not a biological concept, and that unfortunately is what many people wrongfully consider to be the essence of race in humans -- genetic differences," Templeton said.

Opinion. Not relevant. Peer reviewed sicence classifies races under geography. His own research states a 15% difference on average. That is significant.

Written by syrianforce, 16.08.2014 at 19:26

"Evolutionary history is the key to understanding race, and new molecular biology techniques offer so much on recent evolutionary history. I wanted to bring some objectivity to the topic. This very objective analysis shows the outcome is not even a close call: There's nothing even like a really distinct subdivision of humanity."

There doesnt need to be. We recognise colours but there is no distinct colour. There are many variations but there is still groups of these colours. That doesnt mean 'Red' or 'Yellow' doesnt exist. Not the best metaphor but that is his argument and its a shitty argument.

15% difference is HUGE. Not from a species perspective but most certainly when it comes to social policy. It also means the idea of Equality is LITERALLY unattainable between these groups due to this significant difference.

Are Dogs equal?

Again There's lots of genetic variation in humanity, but it's basically at the individual level. The between-population variation is ---->very, very minor<--------

15% in this context is not significant.

It's not someones "opinion" this is scientific research that he analyzed.

Written by syrianforce, 16.08.2014 at 19:51

Again There's lots of genetic variation in humanity, but it's basically at the individual level. The between-population variation is ---->very, very minor<--------

15% in this context is not significant.

Thats it, thats all you have? Repeating the same argument that got BTFO less than ten minutes ago? Quoting some singular researcher without source or background that specifies species when we were discussing race.

You were aleady shown you were wrong. Repeating the same argument doesnt make it any better. It makes you look like more of a chump. 15% is NOT minor when dictating social policy.

You also didnt answer the question. Are Dogs equal?