SL/HTML5

I seriously don't get it, why not perfect HTML5 before completely releasing it and making it permanent.

SL seemed to be running just fine while HTML was being made so I don't understand the problem. If you could have them both running why not keep SL out until HTML is actually completely playable.

I am not sure if it's my computer or the game, But it takes me 3 or more seconds just to open a city in HTML. Do the math, you wouldn't get nearly enough done in the 4 minutes that games give you because of the lag.

4 minutes in HTML is more like 3 minutes and 15 seconds considering the turn ends at 45 seconds.

4 minutes in HTML is like 2 minutes in SL because of the lag it's terrible.

Problems need to be fixed, the competitive side will die if the game doesn't live up to the expectations it used to be.
Considering 70% of the AW community is made of of competitive gamers.

The rest is mainly Roleplay, Ancients, and World war games.

That's a huge majority of the players I would say. Just do something quick or the 150 truly active players that login everyday is going to turn into about 50-70 real active players. And I would say that isn't good for business.

While I agree with this, the competetive community actually makes up the >30% with world ancient and Roleplay making up the >70%, But I would assume they are not enjoying the slow and sluggish gameplay HTML5 is providing either....

Because Silverlight is being killed off!

Doi!

Written by Guest, 08.10.2015 at 21:06

While I agree with this, the competetive community actually makes up the >30% with world ancient and Roleplay making up the >70%, But I would assume they are not enjoying the slow and sluggish gameplay HTML5 is providing either....

...curiously, HTML5 works better than Silverlight did for me. I'm actually able to wall a city in under 20 seconds.

That's a big, big improvement from lag and "reconnecting..." mess that was Silverlight.

Long term HTML5 is better ofc, and the servers for SL were horrible while both platforms ran. I see the admins' point wanting to make the switch as fast as possible. The question is: Is HTML5 ready? If yes then switch as fast as possible, and if not then wait a few weeks. They chose yes and switched as fast as possible, and it wasn't ready for a lot of the players (with old comp). Those players will suffer until gameplay is optimized, and that should be the admins' priority. Just hold on a few weeks if not days and hopefully HTML will be playable for slower computers.

Written by PleaseMe, 08.10.2015 at 18:37

I seriously don't get it, why not perfect HTML5 before completely releasing it and making it permanent.

SL seemed to be running just fine while HTML was being made so I don't understand the problem. If you could have them both running why not keep SL out until HTML is actually completely playable.

I am not sure if it's my computer or the game, But it takes me 3 or more seconds just to open a city in HTML. Do the math, you wouldn't get nearly enough done in the 4 minutes that games give you because of the lag.

4 minutes in HTML is more like 3 minutes and 15 seconds considering the turn ends at 45 seconds.

4 minutes in HTML is like 2 minutes in SL because of the lag it's terrible.

Problems need to be fixed, the competitive side will die if the game doesn't live up to the expectations it used to be.
Considering 70% of the AW community is made of of competitive gamers.

The rest is mainly Roleplay, Ancients, and World war games.

That's a huge majority of the players I would say. Just do something quick or the 150 truly active players that login everyday is going to turn into about 50-70 real active players. And I would say that isn't good for business.

I laughed when you said "competitives" make up 70% of the game.
You and Tito both have 1 thing in common, you make up statistics.

Competitives make up less than 20% of Atwar, being the huge majority of the players in Scenarios and Maps, and within those, Roleplay and WW1,on its majority, and scattered on other map types.

gg


I do support his point of view, HTML5 needs perfection.

Written by International, 09.10.2015 at 03:38

Written by Guest, 08.10.2015 at 21:06

While I agree with this, the competetive community actually makes up the >30% with world ancient and Roleplay making up the >70%, But I would assume they are not enjoying the slow and sluggish gameplay HTML5 is providing either....

...curiously, HTML5 works better than Silverlight did for me. I'm actually able to wall a city in under 20 seconds.

That's a big, big improvement from lag and "reconnecting..." mess that was Silverlight.

Same, I lag as fuck in big maps on SL, but not anymore

Html5 Afterwind works fine for me, if not perfectly. I got way too much disconnection on Silverlight + map lag. Html5 is way better for me.

I only dislike new look on website, looks like tablet/iphone display (which is very childish for my taste), but i ignore that, it's just fashion for picky. Afterwind darker display was much better, maybe create mod for us older?

Written by International, 09.10.2015 at 03:38

...curiously, HTML5 works better than Silverlight did for me. I'm actually able to wall a city in under 20 seconds.

That's a big, big improvement from lag and "reconnecting..." mess that was Silverlight.

Walling a city in sl was 3sec,in html 20.

Written by The Tactician, 09.10.2015 at 04:40

Long term HTML5 is better ofc, and the servers for SL were horrible while both platforms ran. I see the admins' point wanting to make the switch as fast as possible. The question is: Is HTML5 ready? If yes then switch as fast as possible, and if not then wait a few weeks. They chose yes and switched as fast as possible, and it wasn't ready for a lot of the players (with old comp). Those players will suffer until gameplay is optimized, and that should be the admins' priority. Just hold on a few weeks if not days and hopefully HTML will be playable for slower computers.

cuz of buttlickers like you,no cw being played on html.

Written by Al Fappino, 09.10.2015 at 04:56

Competitives make up less than 20% of Atwar, being the huge majority of the players in Scenarios and Maps, and within those, Roleplay and WW1,on its majority, and scattered on other map types.

mbe we are In base 20%,but who plays most?us.

Competitive players probably make up 70% of high ranks. Its what usually tends to hold our interest in the game.

Written by Kromn, 12.10.2015 at 08:55

Written by The Tactician, 09.10.2015 at 04:40

Long term HTML5 is better ofc, and the servers for SL were horrible while both platforms ran. I see the admins' point wanting to make the switch as fast as possible. The question is: Is HTML5 ready? If yes then switch as fast as possible, and if not then wait a few weeks. They chose yes and switched as fast as possible, and it wasn't ready for a lot of the players (with old comp). Those players will suffer until gameplay is optimized, and that should be the admins' priority. Just hold on a few weeks if not days and hopefully HTML will be playable for slower computers.

cuz of buttlickers like you,no cw being played on html.

because trying to view a matter objectively and making a statement based on it is buttlicking... k

to you anybody who says anything good about html is buttlicking

ill eventually play cws on html so you dont have to worry about that, but be my guest and feel free to quit cw'ing (and aw altogether)

Actually, all the players (100%) are competitive, since we all compete for SP.

Written by clovis1122, 12.10.2015 at 10:40

Actually, all the players (100%) are competitive, since we all compete for SP.

.. However, if you are talking about a certain group that define themselves as "competitive" that only plays eu+, then let me tell you there are literally < 1% of the database. You can only feel their presence in both forums and the game because that 1% of players are composed by some mods.

Stop trolling and bringing your personal vendettas to every thread, i already had to delete this nonsense from the europe tournament thread where you were obviously seeking to cause arguments(offtopic arguments no less). Competitive obviously refers to players who compete in cws tournaments and duels. Mecoy is part of that group and was evidently referring to them. And the vast majority of high ranks in the community make up that group.

Written by clovis1122, 12.10.2015 at 11:59

Written by Permamuted, 12.10.2015 at 11:51

Competitive obviously refers to players who compete in cws tournaments and duels.

That is just your opinion...

nope, you compete in competitions, you're competitive, this holds true across sports and even computer games. Your definition is much more of a stretch, but fortunately for you the english language is very flexible. However this aside, when a player refers to "competitive players", you can safely assume they are referring to the definition i mentioned. Now kindly take your silly trolling contrarian nonsense elsewhere.

Am I the only one having no issues with html5?

Written by clovis1122, 12.10.2015 at 12:55

<insert trash>

You are wrong. I won't argue either as that's not the point of this thread, but your only posts were about what competitive means, so don't go around telling people they're going off-topic.

Yall got me fucked up, this thread was just me ranting. Just realized yall were still on it lol.

Silverlight gonna get headshot soon D

Written by AlBoZzZ, 12.10.2015 at 14:12

Silverlight gonna get headshot soon D

microsoft's gonna delete it in 2020,is it soon?

Written by clovis1122, 12.10.2015 at 11:59

Written by Permamuted, 12.10.2015 at 11:51

Competitive obviously refers to players who compete in cws tournaments and duels.

That is just your opinion...

fuck,agree with laochra,time for suicide.

Written by clovis1122, 12.10.2015 at 12:55

Look I am not going to argue with you about what competitive means. That is not the point of this thread. However, I would appreciate if you can stop stating your opinion like if it was a fact, because it is not. You can lie to yourself, and maybe even to some players. But at the end of the day, the truth is always one. We all compete and gain SP (and sometimes even protocoins) from all the games, and whenever you like this or not, this is the truth.

you state you dont wish to argue but then follow that up with an accusation at a mod of lying to the community. Allow me to make this thread a point of reference to those who don't think clovis is a contrarian troll.

Can you point out to me where exactly i lied?



What is the point of even making the link to gaining sp as a competitive element of the game other than purely for the purpose of being a contrarian? It is obviously not what mecoy was referring to.

Furthermore you introduced this discussion to the thread based off the original post, it is not offtopic. It is however a useless waste of forum space designed purely to troll which is why i criticised your posts. My patience grows thin, i was very lenient in the tournament thread and simply deleted your attempts to create a flame war with your post about rankism. I was fully in my right to mute you there. Stop this silly trolling or suffer the consequences, none of us want to read it.

"We all compete for sp."

Clovis your trolling is becoming legendary.

Written by Permamuted, 12.10.2015 at 14:29

Stop this silly trolling or suffer the consequences, none of us want to read it.

he is 10x more annoying in off-topic, sometimes i think he is autistic

Written by Kromn, 12.10.2015 at 08:55

Written by International, 09.10.2015 at 03:38

...curiously, HTML5 works better than Silverlight did for me. I'm actually able to wall a city in under 20 seconds.

That's a big, big improvement from lag and "reconnecting..." mess that was Silverlight.

Walling a city in sl was 3sec,in html 20.

Written by The Tactician, 09.10.2015 at 04:40

Long term HTML5 is better ofc, and the servers for SL were horrible while both platforms ran. I see the admins' point wanting to make the switch as fast as possible. The question is: Is HTML5 ready? If yes then switch as fast as possible, and if not then wait a few weeks. They chose yes and switched as fast as possible, and it wasn't ready for a lot of the players (with old comp). Those players will suffer until gameplay is optimized, and that should be the admins' priority. Just hold on a few weeks if not days and hopefully HTML will be playable for slower computers.

cuz of buttlickers like you,no cw being played on html.

Written by Al Fappino, 09.10.2015 at 04:56

Competitives make up less than 20% of Atwar, being the huge majority of the players in Scenarios and Maps, and within those, Roleplay and WW1,on its majority, and scattered on other map types.

mbe we are In base 20%,but who plays most?us.

20%----> And you consider yourself a true competitive player, mhm, what's next? Soldier not being an elo farmer, but an ultra-competitive? lmao

Written by Permamuted, 12.10.2015 at 10:03

Competitive players probably make up 70% of high ranks. Its what usually tends to hold our interest in the game.

If you consider high ranks to be rank 8+ or rank 9+ I'd say it's more like 55%/60%, there are quite a lot of high ranks on scenarios and non competitive maps, in general.

Written by clovis1122, 12.10.2015 at 11:59

Written by Permamuted, 12.10.2015 at 11:51

Competitive obviously refers to players who compete in cws tournaments and duels.

That is just your opinion...

Are you autistic? I'm not even going to bother to go so low and reply to you, Laochra already represented what we think by answering you with all words.

Written by Al Fappino, 12.10.2015 at 16:55

20%----> And you consider yourself a true competitive player, mhm, what's next? Soldier not being an elo farmer, but an ultra-competitive? lmao

he is elo farmer.
second,competetive players are players who compete in cws:
you:


me:


all cws on amerikanski i played.

Written by Kromn, 12.10.2015 at 17:00

Written by Al Fappino, 12.10.2015 at 16:55

20%----> And you consider yourself a true competitive player, mhm, what's next? Soldier not being an elo farmer, but an ultra-competitive? lmao

he is elo farmer.
second,competetive players are players who compete in cws:
you:


me:


all cws on amerikanski i played.

This proves you're a one-side player, thus close-minded, thanks for sharing your degenerate ARPISM

Written by Al Fappino, 12.10.2015 at 18:01

This proves you're a one-side player, thus close-minded, thanks for sharing your degenerate ARPISM

go to my games list,i play scenarios too.

If this thread was just a rant then it doesn't really have any purpose, does it? lol. Anyway Epic Clan is constantly active and looking for CWs, just that other clans won't play us. We almost got one with VS but opi didn't wanted to, and ENIGMA didn't wanted to play our ranks.

In regards of the duels, I am actually seeing it as normal as previously, so no issues with that. Even I am seeing more 3vs3 than before in main room.

Just like The Tactician said, just like Amok said, they will eventually adapt and play again. This is more a matter of how much it takes them than anything.