72-96h Casuals

I think it would be easy to implement, and it would give us more players for big maps

On the other hand, casual players could coordinate better the start of new games, so enough participants would play them.
Besides, giving more time to join a game does not necessaryly mean that more players will join.

More important is the "no turn 0 reinforcement" for hosts and all the players that started in Turn 0. Take away this "advantage" and more players would join turn 1. Depending on the host, we know that he will exploit to the max the Turn 0 reinforcement, making it difficult for other players to compete.

Written by Columna Durruti, 24.01.2019 at 08:13

More important is the "no turn 0 reinforcement" for hosts and all the players that started in Turn 0. Take away this "advantage" and more players would join turn 1. Depending on the host, we know that he will exploit to the max the Turn 0 reinforcement, making it difficult for other players to compete.

Written by Columna Durruti, 24.01.2019 at 08:13

On the other hand, casual players could coordinate better the start of new games, so enough participants would play them.
Besides, giving more time to join a game does not necessaryly mean that more players will join.

More important is the "no turn 0 reinforcement" for hosts and all the players that started in Turn 0. Take away this "advantage" and more players would join turn 1. Depending on the host, we know that he will exploit to the max the Turn 0 reinforcement, making it difficult for other players to compete.

Not to mention the amount of bugs in Casual... D:

I'd say 48h a turn is more than enough, i'd rather see more spots for people to participate, like worldgames with 30/40 people, we have 200+ countries to pick from, plenty of room, and atleast kind of more fun/action.