Muslim admits his religion is criminal

Written by Unleashed, 15.04.2014 at 14:51

Written by Yazzy, 15.04.2014 at 14:49

Written by Khal.eesi, 11.04.2014 at 11:19

Written by nonames, 11.04.2014 at 10:53

Nowhere in the quran does it tell you to murder or torture any other person on the earth.

Jihad means to struggle against other religions, but this is misinterpreted by countless sadistic religious leaders as an excuse for war.

erm
"The Quran contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to war with nonbelievers for the sake of Islamic rule. Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding. Muslims who do not join the fight are called 'hypocrites' and warned that Allah will send them to Hell if they do not join the slaughter."

If you knew more about the shit you were typing about, you'd know the people who Prophet Muhammad was fighting against are people who killed those who didn't believe the same thing they have, the things you use to Insult Islam (which actually means submission to God) are cultural so why do you act as if an entire 2 billion believers are from 1 country/culture. Remember, the Quran wAs written in 1400, I apologise that you are too much of a child to read this "graphic content", I bet you never have even read the Quran so stop copying and posting mistranslated verses from wherever the hell you find them.

There are 3 possibilites. You are either:

1. A troll.
2. A muslim.
3. A retard.
4. All of the above

Yes, I'm Muslim, no I'm not a Troll, you are mistaken as to who is the retard here and 1/4 of the above.

Written by Yazzy, 15.04.2014 at 14:54

Yes, I'm Muslim, no I'm not a Troll, you are mistaken as to who is the retard here and 1/4 of the above.

I know. You were being too stupid in your posts to be anything else.

Written by Unleashed, 15.04.2014 at 14:56

Written by Yazzy, 15.04.2014 at 14:54

Yes, I'm Muslim, no I'm not a Troll, you are mistaken as to who is the retard here and 1/4 of the above.

I know. You were being too stupid in your posts to be anything else.

The irony emitting from that post gave me cancer.

Written by Yazzy, 15.04.2014 at 14:59

that post gave me cancer.

All of a sudden, I feel really happy

Written by Unleashed, 15.04.2014 at 15:00

Written by Yazzy, 15.04.2014 at 14:59

that post gave me cancer.

All of a sudden, I feel really happy

I'm glad me getting cancer makes you happy

Written by Yazzy, 15.04.2014 at 15:01

Written by Unleashed, 15.04.2014 at 15:00

Written by Yazzy, 15.04.2014 at 14:59

that post gave me cancer.

All of a sudden, I feel really happy

I'm glad me getting cancer makes you happy

Haha. Nice twist there m8. But seriously now, allah doesn't exist. You are living a lie.

Written by Unleashed, 15.04.2014 at 15:03

Written by Yazzy, 15.04.2014 at 15:01

Written by Unleashed, 15.04.2014 at 15:00

Written by Yazzy, 15.04.2014 at 14:59

that post gave me cancer.

All of a sudden, I feel really happy

I'm glad me getting cancer makes you happy

Haha. Nice twist there m8. But seriously now, allah doesn't exist. You are living a lie.

Well then I've been living the truest lie ever told. What is there to prove that God isn't real?

Written by Yazzy, 15.04.2014 at 15:05

Well then I've been living the truest lie ever told. What is there to prove that God isn't real?

HAHAHAHAHA oh my god here we go again. Do I even need to tell you, that you must bring the proof, you idiot? Where is your proof that allah is real?

I don't need to prove that the Flying Spaghetti Monster doesn't exist. If you believe he does, YOU must prove it.

Sigh.

Written by Yazzy, 15.04.2014 at 14:49

Written by Khal.eesi, 11.04.2014 at 11:19

Written by nonames, 11.04.2014 at 10:53

Nowhere in the quran does it tell you to murder or torture any other person on the earth.

Jihad means to struggle against other religions, but this is misinterpreted by countless sadistic religious leaders as an excuse for war.

erm
"The Quran contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to war with nonbelievers for the sake of Islamic rule. Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding. Muslims who do not join the fight are called 'hypocrites' and warned that Allah will send them to Hell if they do not join the slaughter."

If you knew more about the shit you were typing about, you'd know the people who Prophet Muhammad was fighting against are people who killed those who didn't believe the same thing they have, the things you use to Insult Islam (which actually means submission to God) are cultural so why do you act as if an entire 2 billion believers are from 1 country/culture. Remember, the Quran wAs written in 1400, I apologise that you are too much of a child to read this "graphic content", I bet you never have even read the Quran so stop copying and posting mistranslated verses from wherever the hell you find them.

If i understood what you wrote corectly,then you are the worst type of human being there is.
A big fucking H Y P O C R I T E.
i still dont get your point exactly though, because you lack the proper english to make it clear.You do know how to try and insult though.

So, do you say that i am lying?Or are all western scholars and academics that translated the Quran lying?Is this all a big western conspiracy?Or that quran does say those things, but it doesnt matter cause so many muslims dont follow it to the letter.If its the first,goodnight.If its the second, so what?How can you believe in something but follow only the things that suit you.Hypocrite is the word im looking for again.So with this logic, i can declare my self a nazi, but if you say to me that nazis want to kill all non-whites,i can just say that i dont follow this specific practice?


P.S. Also please stop lying when you talk about me.You said i insulted islam.I never "insulted" anything.If i did explain me how.I just provided some facts based on what i have read on the matter.Providing information about a subject is not insulting,yes?

Written by Yazzy, 15.04.2014 at 15:05

Well then I've been living the truest lie ever told. What is there to prove that God isn't real?

Now he's not responding anymore. It's so funny. Cause I remember when I was so convinced that Santa Claus is real.

I believed it with all my heart.

Written by Khal.eesi, 15.04.2014 at 16:34

Written by Yazzy, 15.04.2014 at 14:49

Written by Khal.eesi, 11.04.2014 at 11:19

Written by nonames, 11.04.2014 at 10:53

Nowhere in the quran does it tell you to murder or torture any other person on the earth.

Jihad means to struggle against other religions, but this is misinterpreted by countless sadistic religious leaders as an excuse for war.

erm
"The Quran contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to war with nonbelievers for the sake of Islamic rule. Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding. Muslims who do not join the fight are called 'hypocrites' and warned that Allah will send them to Hell if they do not join the slaughter."

If you knew more about the shit you were typing about, you'd know the people who Prophet Muhammad was fighting against are people who killed those who didn't believe the same thing they have, the things you use to Insult Islam (which actually means submission to God) are cultural so why do you act as if an entire 2 billion believers are from 1 country/culture. Remember, the Quran wAs written in 1400, I apologise that you are too much of a child to read this "graphic content", I bet you never have even read the Quran so stop copying and posting mistranslated verses from wherever the hell you find them.

If i understood what you wrote corectly,then you are the worst type of human being there is.
A big fucking H Y P O C R I T E.
i still dont get your point exactly though, because you lack the proper english to make it clear.You do know how to try and insult though.

So, do you say that i am lying?Or are all western scholars and academics that translated the Quran lying?Is this all a big western conspiracy?Or that quran does say those things, but it doesnt matter cause so many muslims dont follow it to the letter.If its the first,goodnight.If its the second, so what?How can you believe in something but follow only the things that suit you.Hypocrite is the word im looking for again.So with this logic, i can declare my self a nazi, but if you say to me that nazis want to kill all non-whites,i can just say that i dont follow this specific practice?


P.S. Also please stop lying when you talk about me.You said i insulted islam.I never "insulted" anything.If i did explain me how.I just provided some facts based on what i have read on the matter.Providing information about a subject is not insulting,yes?

Firstly: You say I lack the proper english to make my points clear when I'm from England and you're from GREECE, suprised you even have internet.

Secondly: The Qu'ran does not instruct people to kill all un-believers, it instructs them to fight back against those who opress the believers in the name of GOD. Why believe the people who don't even believe in Islam when there people who actually speak the language in which the Qu'ran was originally written in and have actually been reading Qu'ran their whole life.

I swear this guy is retarded.

Written by Yazzy, 16.04.2014 at 09:56

Written by Khal.eesi, 15.04.2014 at 16:34

Written by Yazzy, 15.04.2014 at 14:49

Written by Khal.eesi, 11.04.2014 at 11:19

Written by nonames, 11.04.2014 at 10:53

Nowhere in the quran does it tell you to murder or torture any other person on the earth.

Jihad means to struggle against other religions, but this is misinterpreted by countless sadistic religious leaders as an excuse for war.

erm
"The Quran contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to war with nonbelievers for the sake of Islamic rule. Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding. Muslims who do not join the fight are called 'hypocrites' and warned that Allah will send them to Hell if they do not join the slaughter."

If you knew more about the shit you were typing about, you'd know the people who Prophet Muhammad was fighting against are people who killed those who didn't believe the same thing they have, the things you use to Insult Islam (which actually means submission to God) are cultural so why do you act as if an entire 2 billion believers are from 1 country/culture. Remember, the Quran wAs written in 1400, I apologise that you are too much of a child to read this "graphic content", I bet you never have even read the Quran so stop copying and posting mistranslated verses from wherever the hell you find them.

If i understood what you wrote corectly,then you are the worst type of human being there is.
A big fucking H Y P O C R I T E.
i still dont get your point exactly though, because you lack the proper english to make it clear.You do know how to try and insult though.

So, do you say that i am lying?Or are all western scholars and academics that translated the Quran lying?Is this all a big western conspiracy?Or that quran does say those things, but it doesnt matter cause so many muslims dont follow it to the letter.If its the first,goodnight.If its the second, so what?How can you believe in something but follow only the things that suit you.Hypocrite is the word im looking for again.So with this logic, i can declare my self a nazi, but if you say to me that nazis want to kill all non-whites,i can just say that i dont follow this specific practice?


P.S. Also please stop lying when you talk about me.You said i insulted islam.I never "insulted" anything.If i did explain me how.I just provided some facts based on what i have read on the matter.Providing information about a subject is not insulting,yes?

Firstly: You say I lack the proper english to make my points clear when I'm from England and you're from GREECE, suprised you even have internet.

Secondly: The Qu'ran does not instruct people to kill all un-believers, it instructs them to fight back against those who opress the believers in the name of GOD. Why believe the people who don't even believe in Islam when there people who actually speak the language in which the Qu'ran was originally written in and have actually been reading Qu'ran their whole life.

Firstly: Nice attempt to insult me, yet another time.I dont get why you are so aggressive, but anyway i ll have you know , i have visited your country, about 12-13 times and even lived there for some months in Colchester.I doubt you ever visited Greece to know how it actually is.So, yet again,for another time,you speak without evidence.So in your mind it is wrong to stereotype Muslims, but it is ok for you to stereotype Greeks, without even having met one?Ok..

Secondly: Its non-believers*.You must be an immigrant in Uk yourself, correct?You still didnt gave me a clear answer to my questions though, but if i understood you correctly, you are saying that all non-muslims who translated the Quran, are lying and are deliberately misinterpreting the verses that talk about murder and torture, to promote their own agenda against Islam?Is this correct?

Written by Yazzy, 16.04.2014 at 09:56

Written by Khal.eesi, 15.04.2014 at 16:34

Written by Yazzy, 15.04.2014 at 14:49

Written by Khal.eesi, 11.04.2014 at 11:19

Written by nonames, 11.04.2014 at 10:53

Nowhere in the quran does it tell you to murder or torture any other person on the earth.

"The Quran contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to war with nonbelievers for the sake of Islamic rule. Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding.

I apologise that you are too much of a child to read this "graphic content", I bet you never have even read the Quran so stop copying and posting mistranslated verses from wherever the hell you find them.

So, do you say that i am lying?Or are all western scholars and academics that translated the Quran lying?Is this all a big western conspiracy?

Why believe the people who don't even believe in Islam when there people who actually speak the language in which the Qu'ran was originally written in and have actually been reading Qu'ran their whole life.

Lmao, this guy, if you don't belive non-muslims then go back to the middle east, nobody wants extremist in UK.

Written by UnIeashed, 16.04.2014 at 10:30

Written by Yazzy, 16.04.2014 at 09:56

Written by Khal.eesi, 15.04.2014 at 16:34

Written by Yazzy, 15.04.2014 at 14:49

Written by Khal.eesi, 11.04.2014 at 11:19

Written by nonames, 11.04.2014 at 10:53

Nowhere in the quran does it tell you to murder or torture any other person on the earth.

"The Quran contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to war with nonbelievers for the sake of Islamic rule. Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding.

I apologise that you are too much of a child to read this "graphic content", I bet you never have even read the Quran so stop copying and posting mistranslated verses from wherever the hell you find them.

So, do you say that i am lying?Or are all western scholars and academics that translated the Quran lying?Is this all a big western conspiracy?

Why believe the people who don't even believe in Islam when there people who actually speak the language in which the Qu'ran was originally written in and have actually been reading Qu'ran their whole life.

Lmao, this guy, if you don't belive non-muslims then go back to the middle east, nobody wants extremist in UK.

that's funny because I'm probably more British than you, my parents have Anglo-Saxon blood in them all the way from when the Nomads invading. Don't assume that I'm a foreigner just because I believe the RIGHT religion.

Written by Yazzy, 16.04.2014 at 14:54

Written by UnIeashed, 16.04.2014 at 10:30

Written by Yazzy, 16.04.2014 at 09:56

Written by Khal.eesi, 15.04.2014 at 16:34

Written by Yazzy, 15.04.2014 at 14:49

Written by Khal.eesi, 11.04.2014 at 11:19

Written by nonames, 11.04.2014 at 10:53

Nowhere in the quran does it tell you to murder or torture any other person on the earth.

"The Quran contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to war with nonbelievers for the sake of Islamic rule. Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding.

I apologise that you are too much of a child to read this "graphic content", I bet you never have even read the Quran so stop copying and posting mistranslated verses from wherever the hell you find them.

So, do you say that i am lying?Or are all western scholars and academics that translated the Quran lying?Is this all a big western conspiracy?

Why believe the people who don't even believe in Islam when there people who actually speak the language in which the Qu'ran was originally written in and have actually been reading Qu'ran their whole life.

Lmao, this guy, if you don't belive non-muslims then go back to the middle east, nobody wants extremist in UK.

that's funny because I'm probably more British than you, my parents have Anglo-Saxon blood in them all the way from when the Nomads invading. Don't assume that I'm a foreigner just because I believe the RIGHT religion.

Hahaha i love how u say "right" religion, are you saying that the beliefs of all non-muslims are wrong? If so? What makes your religion better than all the others? Hahahaha

Written by UnIeashed, 16.04.2014 at 15:06

Written by Yazzy, 16.04.2014 at 14:54

Written by UnIeashed, 16.04.2014 at 10:30

Written by Yazzy, 16.04.2014 at 09:56

Written by Khal.eesi, 15.04.2014 at 16:34

Written by Yazzy, 15.04.2014 at 14:49

Written by Khal.eesi, 11.04.2014 at 11:19

Written by nonames, 11.04.2014 at 10:53

Nowhere in the quran does it tell you to murder or torture any other person on the earth.

"The Quran contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to war with nonbelievers for the sake of Islamic rule. Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding.

I apologise that you are too much of a child to read this "graphic content", I bet you never have even read the Quran so stop copying and posting mistranslated verses from wherever the hell you find them.

So, do you say that i am lying?Or are all western scholars and academics that translated the Quran lying?Is this all a big western conspiracy?

Why believe the people who don't even believe in Islam when there people who actually speak the language in which the Qu'ran was originally written in and have actually been reading Qu'ran their whole life.

Lmao, this guy, if you don't belive non-muslims then go back to the middle east, nobody wants extremist in UK.

that's funny because I'm probably more British than you, my parents have Anglo-Saxon blood in them all the way from when the Nomads invading. Don't assume that I'm a foreigner just because I believe the RIGHT religion.

Hahaha i love how u say "right" religion, are you saying that the beliefs of all non-muslims are wrong? If so? What makes your religion better than all the others? Hahahaha

Strictly speaking, there will only be 1 true religion or none at all in the end. So yes, in my eyes, other religions are wrong, the same could be said for a Jew or a Christian.

My religion is better because it is the TRUE religion, what other reason is needed?

Written by Unleashed, 11.04.2014 at 04:11

Written by Khal.eesi, 10.04.2014 at 18:48

Islam revealed hue..btw i have several arab friends here from diferrent parts and non of them is muslim,they are all atheists and they are very cool guys.

In the republic of ignorance, thinking is dangerous.

Written by Guest, 11.04.2014 at 02:15

This right here. The Pope and other important people are all humans. All subject to mistakes, big or small.
Religion: Don't steal, mmkay? Oh and, don't love money too much.
Pope: Do what I say, I am raising money for a glorious crusade! So gimmie money.
*later*
Pope: Oh uh, I had to fix some things. No crusade today.
See?

"I'm a christian, I'm so superior, let me bash catholics and muslims". Hahah. The arrogance of religious people, each thinking they're the special ones. Priceless.

Sorry to spoil your fun son, but you are equally retarded. You're no better.

Your God is George Carlin, and your Religion is Unexamined Atheism.
What does this make you?

A fool, and as dogmatic as a cave-dwelling fire-worshiper.

Written by zombieyeti, 16.04.2014 at 20:43

Written by Unleashed, 11.04.2014 at 04:11

Written by Khal.eesi, 10.04.2014 at 18:48

Islam revealed hue..btw i have several arab friends here from diferrent parts and non of them is muslim,they are all atheists and they are very cool guys.

In the republic of ignorance, thinking is dangerous.

Written by Guest, 11.04.2014 at 02:15

This right here. The Pope and other important people are all humans. All subject to mistakes, big or small.
Religion: Don't steal, mmkay? Oh and, don't love money too much.
Pope: Do what I say, I am raising money for a glorious crusade! So gimmie money.
*later*
Pope: Oh uh, I had to fix some things. No crusade today.
See?

"I'm a christian, I'm so superior, let me bash catholics and muslims". Hahah. The arrogance of religious people, each thinking they're the special ones. Priceless.

Sorry to spoil your fun son, but you are equally retarded. You're no better.

Your God is George Carlin, and your Religion is Unexamined Atheism.
What does this make you?

A fool, and as dogmatic as a cave-dwelling fire-worshiper.

In a more serious note, i think atheism vs religion is a pointless conflict.

Written by UnIeashed, 16.04.2014 at 21:01

Written by zombieyeti, 16.04.2014 at 20:43

Written by Unleashed, 11.04.2014 at 04:11

Written by Khal.eesi, 10.04.2014 at 18:48

Islam revealed hue..btw i have several arab friends here from diferrent parts and non of them is muslim,they are all atheists and they are very cool guys.

In the republic of ignorance, thinking is dangerous.

Written by Guest, 11.04.2014 at 02:15

This right here. The Pope and other important people are all humans. All subject to mistakes, big or small.
Religion: Don't steal, mmkay? Oh and, don't love money too much.
Pope: Do what I say, I am raising money for a glorious crusade! So gimmie money.
*later*
Pope: Oh uh, I had to fix some things. No crusade today.
See?

"I'm a christian, I'm so superior, let me bash catholics and muslims". Hahah. The arrogance of religious people, each thinking they're the special ones. Priceless.

Sorry to spoil your fun son, but you are equally retarded. You're no better.

Your God is George Carlin, and your Religion is Unexamined Atheism.
What does this make you?

A fool, and as dogmatic as a cave-dwelling fire-worshiper.

In a more serious note, i think atheism vs religion is a pointless conflict.

1. I owe you an apology. I don't recollect you claiming that G. Carlin was an expert on anything, and I am not making claims that you are or not an unexamined athiest.
2. That being said, clearly you don't understand what the Futurama picture is trying to illustrate.
Now, look at the cartoon you posted, and try to understand what it is saying, and tell me how in any way it is any different than Unleashed argument.

When one bases their worldview (God doesn't exist) on self-referential circular reasoning, that makes one as dogmatically unexamined as the most base religious person.

Written by UnIeashed, 16.04.2014 at 21:01

Written by zombieyeti, 16.04.2014 at 20:43

Written by Unleashed, 11.04.2014 at 04:11

Written by Khal.eesi, 10.04.2014 at 18:48

Islam revealed hue..btw i have several arab friends here from diferrent parts and non of them is muslim,they are all atheists and they are very cool guys.

In the republic of ignorance, thinking is dangerous.

Written by Guest, 11.04.2014 at 02:15

This right here. The Pope and other important people are all humans. All subject to mistakes, big or small.
Religion: Don't steal, mmkay? Oh and, don't love money too much.
Pope: Do what I say, I am raising money for a glorious crusade! So gimmie money.
*later*
Pope: Oh uh, I had to fix some things. No crusade today.
See?

"I'm a christian, I'm so superior, let me bash catholics and muslims". Hahah. The arrogance of religious people, each thinking they're the special ones. Priceless.

Sorry to spoil your fun son, but you are equally retarded. You're no better.

Your God is George Carlin, and your Religion is Unexamined Atheism.
What does this make you?

A fool, and as dogmatic as a cave-dwelling fire-worshiper.

In a more serious note, i think atheism vs religion is a pointless conflict.

Regarding Atheism vs. Religion
It is perhaps a pointless conflict (inasmuch as there is unlikely to be a resolution) but I don't think that the conflict is without need.
An emergent phenomena in scientific and philosophical circles is 'New Atheism' - and it contains a belief system as unexaminedly dogmatic and emotionally charged for its proponents, as any religion.

For millennia, people who chose not to believe in God/Gods/The State Religion kept to themselves, or were persecuted. This is injustice.
Likewise, people who hold religious beliefs different or contrary to the State's doctrine were also persecuted. This is *also* injustice. Sometimes the state is atheist, and religious belief is 'counter-revolutionary' - again, this is injustice.

From the beginning of the Age of Reason until almost yesterday (1990s or so), the questions of Science and the questions of Religion were markedly separated by educated people. Theories, hypotheses, observation and evidence are the domain of science. Ultimate Questions and Truths were the domain of metaphysics.
There was almost no overlap of these two domains, for educated people.

Harris, Dawkins, Ali and Dennet (among others) are scientists and scholars who would argue that Ultimate Questions and Religious Claims are as testable as any scientific hypothesis, and should be subjected to the same rigorous method of scientific falsification.

This is not bad 'science' - but it IS poor reasoning. Dawkins and Harris both see the world through the dogma of the scientific method - both have their eyes permanently closed to the *possibility* that their approach to human understanding may be flawed, but both are so sure of their belief system that they would eschew all other domains of human knowledge as subservient to the scientific method.

Clearly this is a dangerous state of affairs. The scientific method is apolitical but addresses only one slim range of the human experience. Scientists on the other hand are just as dogmatic and cliquey as any other human beings.

Both science and religion are human undertakings, and neither should rule over human liberty.

Written by Yazzy, 16.04.2014 at 15:11

Strictly speaking, there will only be 1 true religion or none at all in the end. So yes, in my eyes, other religions are wrong, the same could be said for a Jew or a Christian.

My religion is better because it is the TRUE religion, what other reason is needed?

It's funny how ferocious and combative these people are against my truths, yet when they see someone speakijng outrageous nonsense like this, they ignore it alltogether. I think this speaks volumes.

Written by Unleashed, 17.04.2014 at 02:53

Written by Yazzy, 16.04.2014 at 15:11

Strictly speaking, there will only be 1 true religion or none at all in the end. So yes, in my eyes, other religions are wrong, the same could be said for a Jew or a Christian.

My religion is better because it is the TRUE religion, what other reason is needed?

It's funny how ferocious and combative these people are against my truths, yet when they see someone speakijng outrageous nonsense like this, they ignore it alltogether. I think this speaks volumes.

lol - you *really* don't get it.
Whether or not his religious belief is *TRUE* his argument is *VALID* - you really don't realize the difference between the two states?
Really?

People are 'ferociously combative' against your 'truths' because you make logically invalid arguments - literally the words that your brain shits onto the screen are worse than nonsense in their effectiveness towards convincing others of your meaning.

The argument EnD is making is *logically consistent* - a state of argumentative achievement you have never achieved, at least intentionally.

Written by zombieyeti, 17.04.2014 at 04:19

Written by Unleashed, 17.04.2014 at 02:53

Written by Yazzy, 16.04.2014 at 15:11

Strictly speaking, there will only be 1 true religion or none at all in the end. So yes, in my eyes, other religions are wrong, the same could be said for a Jew or a Christian.

My religion is better because it is the TRUE religion, what other reason is needed?

It's funny how ferocious and combative these people are against my truths, yet when they see someone speakijng outrageous nonsense like this, they ignore it alltogether. I think this speaks volumes.

lol - you *really* don't get it.
Whether or not his religious belief is *TRUE* his argument is *VALID* - you really don't realize the difference between the two states?
Really?

People are 'ferociously combative' against your 'truths' because you make logically invalid arguments - literally the words that your brain shits onto the screen are worse than nonsense in their effectiveness towards convincing others of your meaning.

The argument EnD is making is *logically consistent* - a state of argumentative achievement you have never achieved, at least intentionally.

excuse me, but what exactly is valid, from what that guy said.I havent heard anything from him yet, other than "what i say is the truth because i said so".He failed to answer my last post also.I realize that "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" , but please dont apply it to this particular discussion

Written by zombieyeti, 17.04.2014 at 04:19

Written by Unleashed, 17.04.2014 at 02:53

Written by Yazzy, 16.04.2014 at 15:11

Strictly speaking, there will only be 1 true religion or none at all in the end. So yes, in my eyes, other religions are wrong, the same could be said for a Jew or a Christian.

My religion is better because it is the TRUE religion, what other reason is needed?

It's funny how ferocious and combative these people are against my truths, yet when they see someone speakijng outrageous nonsense like this, they ignore it alltogether. I think this speaks volumes.

lol - you *really* don't get it.
Whether or not his religious belief is *TRUE* his argument is *VALID* - you really don't realize the difference between the two states?
Really?

People are 'ferociously combative' against your 'truths' because you make logically invalid arguments - literally the words that your brain shits onto the screen are worse than nonsense in their effectiveness towards convincing others of your meaning.

The argument EnD is making is *logically consistent* - a state of argumentative achievement you have never achieved, at least intentionally.

Now i get it, you have been a hypocrite all along, your agenda is becoming more and more apparent each time you reply to unleashed.

1.- E.n.D makes the sames arguments that a insane man would do, yet you haven't tried to intervene like you did with unleashed.

2.- YOU can't prove wrong unleashed's argument so you proceed to discredit him making rude comments and insults about his intellect and way of thinking.

This leads me to the belief that you are either:

[A] Religious
[B] Hate Unleashed

A: this will make a joke out of your claim that you are neutral and debate just for sake of recreative purposes.

B: this will make you bias.

And btw, you already changed the topic of religion to a topic about your ego.

Written by Khal.eesi, 17.04.2014 at 08:15

Written by zombieyeti, 17.04.2014 at 04:19

Written by Unleashed, 17.04.2014 at 02:53

Written by Yazzy, 16.04.2014 at 15:11

Strictly speaking, there will only be 1 true religion or none at all in the end. So yes, in my eyes, other religions are wrong, the same could be said for a Jew or a Christian.

My religion is better because it is the TRUE religion, what other reason is needed?

It's funny how ferocious and combative these people are against my truths, yet when they see someone speakijng outrageous nonsense like this, they ignore it alltogether. I think this speaks volumes.

lol - you *really* don't get it.
Whether or not his religious belief is *TRUE* his argument is *VALID* - you really don't realize the difference between the two states?
Really?

People are 'ferociously combative' against your 'truths' because you make logically invalid arguments - literally the words that your brain shits onto the screen are worse than nonsense in their effectiveness towards convincing others of your meaning.

The argument EnD is making is *logically consistent* - a state of argumentative achievement you have never achieved, at least intentionally.

excuse me, but what exactly is valid, from what that guy said.I havent heard anything from him yet, other than "what i say is the truth because i said so".He failed to answer my last post also.I realize that "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" , but please dont apply it to this particular discussion

Are you saying that the argument made by EnD is invalid?

Written by UnIeashed, 17.04.2014 at 08:29

Written by zombieyeti, 17.04.2014 at 04:19

Written by Unleashed, 17.04.2014 at 02:53

Written by Yazzy, 16.04.2014 at 15:11

Strictly speaking, there will only be 1 true religion or none at all in the end. So yes, in my eyes, other religions are wrong, the same could be said for a Jew or a Christian.

My religion is better because it is the TRUE religion, what other reason is needed?

It's funny how ferocious and combative these people are against my truths, yet when they see someone speakijng outrageous nonsense like this, they ignore it alltogether. I think this speaks volumes.

lol - you *really* don't get it.
Whether or not his religious belief is *TRUE* his argument is *VALID* - you really don't realize the difference between the two states?
Really?

People are 'ferociously combative' against your 'truths' because you make logically invalid arguments - literally the words that your brain shits onto the screen are worse than nonsense in their effectiveness towards convincing others of your meaning.

The argument EnD is making is *logically consistent* - a state of argumentative achievement you have never achieved, at least intentionally.

Now i get it, you have been a hypocrite all along, your agenda is becoming more and more apparent each time you reply to unleashed.

1.- E.n.D makes the sames arguments that a insane man would do, yet you haven't tried to intervene like you did with unleashed.

2.- YOU can't prove wrong unleashed's argument so you proceed to discredit him making rude comments and insults about his intellect and way of thinking.

This leads me to the belief that you are either:

[A] Religious
[B] Hate Unleashed

A: this will make a joke out of your claim that you are neutral and debate just for sake of recreative purposes.

B: this will make you bias.

And btw, you already changed the topic of religion to a topic about your ego.

(shaking head)
If you wish to discuss the validity of the arguments I make, or the evidence I cite, please do.
Clearly, you haven't. Instead you resort to personal attacks - meaningless, empty, personal attacks.
In my experience this means you have no serious challenge to the validity of my arguments or the evidence I cite.

See Khalesi's response above. K. questions my argument. Do you see the difference?
====
This is the part where you can choose to respond. In my experience, one who leads with personal attacks will not provide a meaningful response, but the opportunity is available for you to do so.

Please tell me my 'agenda' - since it is so 'clear'? Then please tell me of my hypocrisy.

Please also tell me what Unleashed's [u]argument is[/u] since you claim I am trying, and failing, to prove it wrong.
I see words, but an argument is a specific ordering of words, where one builds to one or more conclusions based on a series of propositions supporting a claim.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument

This is the part where I respond to your 'conclusions'.
Summary:
1. So what if I hate Unleashed? So what if I am a biased, hypocritical Muslim? If you care to wrestle with my arguments, or reply to my evidence, do so.
Your empty-name-calling doesn't do anything to prove your point.
2. I am a skeptic, particularly a religious skeptic. I wholeheartedly and completely endorse meaningful skepticism. Unleashed is not a skeptic, he is an ignorant hater of religion. Unleashed does not serve skepticism, he serves hate - which makes him no different from the religious fundamentalists he so stridently opposes.
It would be ironic if it weren't so laughably tragic.

Detail:
I don't hate Unleashed. What little thought I give to the person that is Unleashed can be encapsulated into one word: Pity. But much less than I would give to a homeless person I would meet on the street, or a kitten I saw run over on the road a few days ago.
I despise intolerance, and I am ashamed of how he makes a valid, logical, reasonable philosophical standpoint (skepticism, specifically, religious skepticism) into a rage-filled, anti-theistic ignorance fest. But, for the sake of argument, let's assume I hate Unleashed. How has this changed any argument I have posted in response to him? Not one bit. The arguments stand or fail on the reason and evidence.

Are you accusing me of being a Muslim? Is that the assertion now?
Previously, I've been 'accused' of being a child Professor who is a Jewish Black American German Republican Lesbian Christian Liberal Communist alt of TopHats or others, if all of the accusations are strung together. As if who I am, and what my personal beliefs are, make ONE SINGLE DIFFERENCE on the merits of my arguments, or the value of my evidence.
Note: I am not particularly insulted to be called a Jewish Black American German Lesbian Christian Liberal Communist alt. Clearly I cannot be all of these things at once, and it amuses me that being called some of these things is considered to be an insult.

I attempt to be *charitable* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_charity when I am given a reasonable opportunity, but I am intolerant of ignorance and intolerance generally, especially religious intolerance. You're just inventing things.
As to me being 'neutral' what do you mean? And as to being 'biased' have I ever EVER intentionally misquoted anyone or presented intentionally misleading evidence or arguments? If so, what?
Since you have read the wiki entry on what an argument is, we can see that you have made a series of propositions in support of a conclusion.

Do your arguments support your conclusion? And if so, does it affect the argumentative power of what I have said?

Written by zombieyeti, 17.04.2014 at 16:40

Written by Khal.eesi, 17.04.2014 at 08:15

Written by zombieyeti, 17.04.2014 at 04:19

Written by Unleashed, 17.04.2014 at 02:53

Written by Yazzy, 16.04.2014 at 15:11

Strictly speaking, there will only be 1 true religion or none at all in the end. So yes, in my eyes, other religions are wrong, the same could be said for a Jew or a Christian.

My religion is better because it is the TRUE religion, what other reason is needed?

It's funny how ferocious and combative these people are against my truths, yet when they see someone speakijng outrageous nonsense like this, they ignore it alltogether. I think this speaks volumes.

lol - you *really* don't get it.
Whether or not his religious belief is *TRUE* his argument is *VALID* - you really don't realize the difference between the two states?
Really?

People are 'ferociously combative' against your 'truths' because you make logically invalid arguments - literally the words that your brain shits onto the screen are worse than nonsense in their effectiveness towards convincing others of your meaning.

The argument EnD is making is *logically consistent* - a state of argumentative achievement you have never achieved, at least intentionally.

excuse me, but what exactly is valid, from what that guy said.I havent heard anything from him yet, other than "what i say is the truth because i said so".He failed to answer my last post also.I realize that "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" , but please dont apply it to this particular discussion

Are you saying that the argument made by EnD is invalid?

and thats the reason i dont like to discuss with you.I dont care what you do with unleashed, but i value my time, so dont try to pull this shit on me.What argument is that?What argument did he made exactly?He still hasnt answered my question.I have the reply ready and i am waiting for his answer, which he cleverly evaded.Instead i am talking with you.Why?Are you his lawyer?Are you his bodyguard?Are you robin hood protecting the weak from us "monsters"?Why are you in this specific thread?Why do you feel the need to intervene,without stating your opinion on the matter?You have no personal opinion on the matter, but you want to get in the middle of this,why?Do you and e.n.d. share the same opinion on islam?on quran?Can you contradict MY argument?.If the answer is NO to these questions, then i will kindly ask you to gtfo this thread.thanks

Written by zombieyeti, 17.04.2014 at 17:27

If you wish to discuss the validity of the arguments I make, or the evidence I cite, please do.

You argument is irrelevant to the main topic, since you have based your entire argument in "unleashed is ignorant, therefore i am right" which by far sounds more like a personal attack, and is lovely how then you proceed to accuse me of such a thing.

Here this may help you:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

Written by zombieyeti, 17.04.2014 at 17:27

Clearly, you haven't. Instead you resort to personal attacks - meaningless, empty, personal attacks.

PROVE IT, where did i used personal attacks? why do you consider them personal attacks? do you consider a religion a personal attack? if so, why do you contradict yourself in your notes?

Written by zombieyeti, 17.04.2014 at 17:27

In my experience this means you have no serious challenge to the validity of my arguments or the evidence I cite.

How is the experience of a individual related to validity?
Let say Bob has 15 years working for Taco Bell, and he tells John (his fellow employ) that the meat of a taco is blue, when is clearly brown, does this make bob right just because he has more years working for Taco Bell?

Written by zombieyeti, 17.04.2014 at 17:27

See Khalesi's response above. K. questions my argument. Do you see the difference?

Yes, you didn't replied to him, but you did with me.

Written by zombieyeti, 17.04.2014 at 17:27

This is the part where you can choose to respond. In my experience, one who leads with personal attacks will not provide a meaningful response, but the opportunity is available for you to do so.

As i have explained before, i wasn't using personal attacks, but if you insist, PROVE IT.

Written by zombieyeti, 17.04.2014 at 17:27

Please tell me my 'agenda' - since it is so 'clear'? Then please tell me of my hypocrisy.

You have a religious agenda, but lets assume you don't: you already claimed that you feel superior to unleashed, wish is a Moral high ground fallacy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holier-than-thou

Written by zombieyeti, 17.04.2014 at 17:27

Please also tell me what Unleashed's [u]argument is[/u] since you claim I am trying, and failing, to prove it wrong.
I see words, but an argument is a specific ordering of words, where one builds to one or more conclusions based on a series of propositions supporting a claim.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument

Unleashed's argument is that: Religion is manipulative and leads man to commit "justified" atrocities, which is funny because the religion preaches love and peace
but of course, this required your own interpretation of the pictures presented above, which you most likely skip and jumped into the "Anti-Unleashed" Wagon.

Written by zombieyeti, 17.04.2014 at 17:27

This is the part where I respond to your 'conclusions'.
Summary:
1. So what if I hate Unleashed? So what if I am a biased, hypocritical Muslim? If you care to wrestle with my arguments, or reply to my evidence, do so.
Your empty-name-calling doesn't do anything to prove your point.

If you hate unleashed, then your argument has no credibility, because your intention all along has been to undermine unleashed, regardless of the validity of his "argument".
If you are a biased Muslim, then you will never change your opinion due to having a strong belief in islam, which make this discussion pointless.

Written by zombieyeti, 17.04.2014 at 17:27

2. I am a skeptic, particularly a religious skeptic. I wholeheartedly and completely endorse meaningful skepticism. Unleashed is not a skeptic, he is an ignorant hater of religion. Unleashed does not serve skepticism, he serves hate - which makes him no different from the religious fundamentalists he so stridently opposes.
It would be ironic if it weren't so laughably tragic.

Unleashed doesn't believe in god, and he has good reason not to (endless contradictions within the bible, human nature to twist everything it can in order to be above other humans).

Mocking Religion isn't ignorant, but rather rude.

Written by zombieyeti, 17.04.2014 at 17:27

Detail:
I don't hate Unleashed. What little thought I give to the person that is Unleashed can be encapsulated into one word: Pity. But much less than I would give to a homeless person I would meet on the street, or a kitten I saw run over on the road a few days ago.
I despise intolerance, and I am ashamed of how he makes a valid, logical, reasonable philosophical standpoint (skepticism, specifically, religious skepticism) into a rage-filled, anti-theistic ignorance fest. But, for the sake of argument, let's assume I hate Unleashed. How has this changed any argument I have posted in response to him? Not one bit. The arguments stand or fail on the reason and evidence.

You ignored E.n.D ignorant comments, and limited yourself to personally insult unleashed, you called him a "fool" compared him to a "cave-man" and now you compare him to degrading biological beings, which makes your "Crusade again'ts intolerance" look absurd.

Written by zombieyeti, 17.04.2014 at 17:27

Are you accusing me of being a Muslim? Is that the assertion now?
Previously, I've been 'accused' of being a child Professor who is a Jewish Black American German Republican Lesbian Christian Liberal Communist alt of TopHats or others, if all of the accusations are strung together. As if who I am, and what my personal beliefs are, make ONE SINGLE DIFFERENCE on the merits of my arguments, or the value of my evidence.
Note: I am not particularly insulted to be called a Jewish Black American German Lesbian Christian Liberal Communist alt. Clearly I cannot be all of these things at once, and it amuses me that being called some of these things is considered to be an insult.

I din't accused you of being Muslim, oh no, i only emphasized the possibility that you may believe in some form of God or Deity, regardless of what other people think about you: I think you are a College student that loves debates, and happens to hate unleashed.

Written by zombieyeti, 17.04.2014 at 17:27

I attempt to be *charitable* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_charity when I am given a reasonable opportunity, but I am intolerant of ignorance and intolerance generally, especially religious intolerance. You're just inventing things.
As to me being 'neutral' what do you mean? And as to being 'biased' have I ever EVER intentionally misquoted anyone or presented intentionally misleading evidence or arguments? If so, what?
Since you have read the wiki entry on what an argument is, we can see that you have made a series of propositions in support of a conclusion.

Not specifically misleading but more like this: "Shotgun argumentation - the arguer offers such a large number of arguments for their position that the opponent can't possibly respond to all of them." Wikipedia

Written by zombieyeti, 17.04.2014 at 17:27

Do your arguments support your conclusion? And if so, does it affect the argumentative power of what I have said?

Actually, the paragraph that contained the comparisons with unleashed and a dying cat, helped confirm my conclusion more than my early post.

P.D: Stop bombarding endless amount of sub-subjects when the main topic is about unleashed's statement about religion, not about how bad unleashed is at debating.

Written by UnIeashed, 17.04.2014 at 18:44

P.D: Stop bombarding endless amount of sub-subjects when the main topic is about unleashed's statement about religion, not about how bad unleashed is at debating.

How do you debate with insanity? You can't possibly do it. You are in the ring, boxing against a statue. You are trying to arm wrestle a man without arms. He will laugh in your face and he will actually invite you to try to win. It's a waste of time. Everytime you try to do it with a religious person no result will be reached. Actually there is a possible result if it's a real life debate: he might kill you cause you insulted his beloved imaginary god. And I think zombie isn't far from this type of lunatic.